KAMPALA - The Chief Justice of the Republic of Uganda and Chairperson of the JLOS Leadership Committee delivered a keynote address to participants at the 24th Government of Uganda and Development Partners Sector Review on 12th November 2019. The JLOS Annual Review was held at the Mestil Hotel in Kampala.

 

DOWNLOAD KEYNOTE (PDF)

 

Published: November 13, 2019

The Justice Law and Order Sector (JLOS) Annual Report 2017/18 provides information on the performance of the Sector in the Financial Year 2017/18. It is the first such report under the Fourth Sector Development Plan (SDP IV).

 

  DOWNLOAD REPORT (PDF)

 DOWNLOAD SPEECH (PDF)

 

My Lord, the Chief Justice, 

My Lord, the Deputy Chief Justice, 

My Lord the Principal Judge,

Honourable Ministers in your respective capacities,

Honourable Attorney General, 

Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal,

Your Excellencies and Heads of Diplomatic Missions in Uganda, 

The Secretary to Cabinet and Head of the Public Service,

Members of Parliament Present,

Honourable Justices of the High Court and Judicial Officers here present,

The Solicitor General and Chairperson of the JLOS Steering Committee,

Chairpersons and Members of Constitutional Commissions,

Heads of the Justice Sector Ministries, Departments and Agencies, 

Representatives of Civil Society, the Media and Non-State Actors, 

Invited Guests, 

Ladies and Gentlemen, 

 

Good morning

It is a great pleasure and honour for me to make some opening remarks on behalf of the JLOS Development Partners on the occasion of the joint 23nd Annual Review by the Government of Uganda and its Development Partners of the Justice Law and Order Sector. 

First of all, let me express my appreciation for holding this annual review much more timely than last year. The deliberations of today allow us to still adjust the JLOS Work plan 2018/19 if and where required. In particular those result areas where progress is lagging behind, concerted corrective actions could be considered. 

Secondly, I would also like to express from the outset the appreciation of the JLOS development partners for the hard work and commitment of the JLOS Secretariat, the JLOS institutions and the JLOS Leadership, culminating in this annual review where we take stock of the sector performance of the fiscal year 2017-2018.

We recognize that it’s not an easy task to produce an annual report that reflects all the collective achievements of the 18 JLOS institutions and that meets the expectations of all stakeholders involved. 

My Lord the Chief Justice, last year I started my opening remarks by referring to your strong appeal for more transparency and accountability within the sector. And on many other occasions during this last fiscal year, you have by your spoken word and actions, repeated this important message over and over again. 

We applaud your leadership of the Judiciary and your strong commitment to build more confidence of the Ugandan citizens in the justice, law and order sector. 

In fact, building confidence is at the core of the sector development plan 2017 – 2020 with its mission to improve the safety of the person, security of property, and access to justice for inclusive growth with the slogan:  

Empowering the people. Building trust. Upholding rights.  

It is important to keep on reminding ourselves of this ambitious mission since it constitutes the benchmark for the assessment of the sector performance, asking questions such as:

• Is SDP-IV making a difference in the lives of the Ugandan citizens in terms of safety and security and if so, how do we know that? What is the evidence and how has it been measured against baselines and targets? 

• Are the political will and the institutional capacity of the sector strong enough to implement this ambitious agenda of SDP-IV? 

• Are the linkages of the sector with the Social Development Sector, Civil Society and the Private Sector in place to enhance synergy and collaboration? 

• What am I as an individual doing to enhance the work of the JLOS sector? 

These and similar questions, concerns and challenges are on the table and will hopefully guide the deliberations of today.

Looking back, I think it’s fair to say that the Annual Plan 17/18 of the SDP-IV has been implemented under circumstances that were not always very conducive for smooth sailing towards its annual targets. 

There has been some heavy weather so to speak. 

Let me briefly mention just a few front-page events and incidents. 

The constitutional court judgement of 26 July on the Constitutional Amendment Act no 1 has provoked heated debates and the process itself, such as the consultations, has received serious criticisms from many corners of society. 

Similarly, the first local council elections in 16 years, while widely acclaimed, generated a number of questions and concerns from different stakeholders. 

I don’t need to go into the details here, but the suspension of the accreditation of CCEDU to observe the elections, for example, raised many an eyebrow. 

The Ugandan citizens have witnessed a series of still unresolved gruesome murders of women, police officers and key politicians, putting the UPF – one of the core JLOS institutions - in the spotlight of political and public attention.

The arrest and incarceration of the former IGP, former police officers and the leader of the BodaBoda 2010 all of whom are being tried in the military court martial on various charges. 

And going back a little bit further in time, after two years of the Kasese incident, an independent investigation still hasn’t been carried out, reports of the Uganda Human Rights Commission and the Defence and Internal Affairs Committee of Parliament have not been made public and the victims are still waiting for justice for the 151 persons (including children) who were killed. 

I also want to mention Arua and its aftermath although this falls outside the reporting period. 

The scale, the intensity, the type and the outcome of the violent response of the security forces have been well documented, have generated strong condemnation and widespread dissatisfaction among citizens and youth in particular, but so far nobody has been arrested and prosecuted.

My Lord, Chief Justice, I mention these cases not to bash, or to point fingers or to put Uganda in a negative daylight. 

I do so because they jeopardize the mission of SDP-IV and the sector investments of the Government; 

but they also have an impact on the effectiveness of our contributions and on the political space back home to continue supporting the sector.   

In my speech of last year, I alluded already to these risks when I said: “these incidents can set a trend that will compromise the progress made under SIP III of the Justice, Law and Order Sector”. 

Now, one year later, I see that these incidents indeed seem to have set a trend. 

We – the JLOS Development Partners - urge the respective authorities to take all necessary measures to reverse this trend. 

After all, this trend could impact peace, security and stability with all its consequences for the Ugandan citizens and the development of the country as outlined in Vision 2040. 

As we all know, stability and respect for the rule of law are some of the most important selling points to attract trade and investments. 

And Uganda needs to boost trade and investment for the creation of employment for a very fast growing number of unemployed youth. 

My Lord, in spite of these incidents and its insufficient budget, SDP-IV has managed to deliver significant results. 

I am therefore very pleased to inform you that our overall appreciation is that the sector has performed quite well.  

Allow me to walk you through some of these results. 

We have noted good progress in terms of infrastructure, staffing and staff capacity development, case management, procedural laws, supervision and inspections, and outreach activities. 

The number of districts with one-stop frontline JLOS services has further increased and access to legal services has expanded for which JLOS has also received financial support from the Democratic Governance Facility. 

These and similar developments are having a positive impact of the internal efficiency of the sector as indicated by the clearance rate and case disposal, among others. 

Of course, efficiency needs to go hand-in-hand with anti-corruption, quality assurance and transparency of the services provided.  

Relatively simple technology is available and being tested to systematically collect information from the clients of the service satisfaction rate. 

An interesting pilot is being conducted in a number of police stations in Kampala by an organization called SEMA in close collaboration with the UPF. 

The information generated through this pilot at the level of a police station, is very helpful for performance assessment and improvement by the police officers in the piloted stations. 

Later this morning, you’ll learn more about this pilot.

My Lord, the Chief Justice, allow me to say a few words about progress under outcome 2 – human rights and corruption.  

As also noted in previous years, only marginal progress has been recorded towards meeting the targets. More significant progress can be achieved if human rights violations are more strictly addressed in line with the legal frameworks. 

The approval of the Regulations for the Prohibition and Prevention of Act is an important step forward. 

I also would like to mention here the need to approve the Regulations under the Children’s Act. 

The National Survey on Violence against Children in Uganda, which was recently launched, shows high levels of violence against boys and girls. 

A stronger and coordinated response is needed from all key JLOS institutions to prevent and address these crimes against defenceless victims in close coordination with the social welfare and health sectors.

At the same time, we acknowledge some promising developments such as: 

• the improvement of the clearance rate of the Uganda Human Rights Commission, 

• the decentralization of court awards, 

• the setting up of human rights desks in key JLOS institutions, 

• the scaling up of Joint JLOS inspections 

• and the inspections of the Human Rights Commission and the UPF in places of detention, 

• and the many outreach activities that were carried out. 

Let me now turn to commercial justice and competitiveness, the third strategic outcome of SDP-IV. 

It is laudable to note that the led time is improving for doing business and that the number of Ugandans with national IDs is increasing. 

The Ugandan Registration Services Bureau is commended for reaching out to groups like youth and women. 

Improved disposal of commercial and land disputes is also a promising result though there is still a long way to go. 

My Lord, there is evidence that each of the three outcome areas shows progress and our general conclusion therefore is that SDP-IV is on track and moving in the right direction. 

The sector performance is slowly improving and public confidence is slightly increasing. 

At the same time we also need to recognize that these incremental improvements are not sufficient for the JLOS reform agenda to get momentum.

The following conditions are still to be met for that purpose. 

First, sufficient and adequate financial and human resources need to be allocated to the sector to meet the growing demand for JLOS services due to population growth and improved access. 

Uganda not only need more doctors, teachers and nurses but also more and better judges, prosecutors, police officers and prison wards, to mention but a few. And the conditions need to be in place so that they can all perform their duties optimally. 

Secondly, a much stronger political will is required to support the JLOS reform agenda. 

The frustration – if I may call it like that – is growing in the sector and among the development partners that critical policies and laws don’t get the necessary political support for approval, endorsement and enactment. 

We strongly urge that the pipeline for critical legislation and policies be cleared without any further delay, such as the Judiciary Administration Bill, the Witness Protection Bill, the Legal Aid Policy and Bill, the Transitional Justice Policy and Bill, the Marriage and Divorce Bill and several other regulations. 

Once approved and enacted, they strengthen the independence of the Judiciary and the sector as a whole and promote access to justice for the vulnerable groups in particular. 

The third condition is that corruption needs to be addressed more strongly and more effectively. 

While we would like to commend the sector for acknowledging the existence of corruption within its midst and putting in place strategies to eliminate and prevent the vice, tangible progress should be demonstrated lest the citizens and investors lose trust and confidence in JLOS. 

It is imperative for the sector to tackle the challenge of corruption head-on and frankly though collaborative approaches in the sector. The commitment should be demonstrated by concrete action spearheaded by the Office of the DPP, the police and the judiciary along with other stakeholders represented here today. 

With proper coordination, allegations of corruption in JLOS and detection by the Auditor General of financial irregularities should be followed up more systematically through criminal investigations, prosecutions, adjudication, asset recovery and proper administrative management.

JLOS Institution leaders should understand that they can be held accountable for corruption in their respective institutions.

There is great scope for improvement especially if interventions by JLOS institutions to curb corruption are harmonized with the specific efforts under the Accountability Sector Strategic Investment Plan, including protocols for information-sharing and case referrals. 

My Lord, the Chief Justice, observance of human rights is the pillar of SDP-IV and of our cooperation and partnership with the sector. Allow me to quote the SDP-IV:

"The Vision 2040 highlights the observance of human rights as a critical feature of Uganda’s governance and rule of law architecture. This is also a fundamental intervention that promotes the citizens’ dignity in development, and impacts on Uganda’s national and international governance rating. Continued human rights violations undermine the rule of law and constitutionalism in Uganda, erode public confidence and trust in JLOS institutions, and stands in stern contrast to our regional and international obligations"

The provisions in Uganda's legal framework and international treaties to which the country has acceded, provide all necessary conditions to effectively address human rights violations. 

Acts of torture, violence and repression have no place in Uganda - and can never be justified under any circumstance. We commend the statements by the leadership of the Judiciary that the freedom from torture is a non-derogable right; and that the dignity of the person should be upheld at all times. 

It is therefore the duty of all state actors and institutions including security forces to respect and promote the rights and freedoms guaranteed without undue or arbitrary qualifications. 

Where breaches occur, swift and effective sanctions and accountability should be meted out against the errant officers. 

This brings me to what I would like to call the culture of impunity. 

Impunity equals injustice. 

Ensuring compensation of victims of torture or other human rights violations is paramount, but equally important is that individuals, who have committed these crimes, are being brought to justice. Prosecution and conviction serve as deterrents and enhance individual accountability.

My Lord, the Chief Justice, I have talked about a series of critical issues within the sector and its political context. 

My comments and suggestions are made in view of the progress and challenges of SDP-IV. 

Before closing my remarks, I would also like to share a concern that we should include in our deliberations of today and that is wildlife crime. It is not yet on the SDP Agenda but I think it should be given serious consideration. 

It comprises the fourth largest global illegal trade after narcotics, counterfeiting of products and currency, and human trafficking, and is estimated to be worth at least US$19 billion per year. 

It is a lucrative business for criminal syndicates because the risk involved is low compared to other crimes and high profits can be generated. Some reports even suggest that illegal wildlife trafficking plays an important role into the funding of terrorist organizations. 

Wildlife trafficking is transnational organized crime and any organized crime is based on corruption, which systematically erodes our institutions. Sometimes the trafficking can be out of ignorance and a number of “visitors” to Uganda have been arrested as a result of this. 

In this regard we applaud the work of the wildlife police and Buganda Road court  that has the mandate to try these wildlife related cases. The work of the sector needs to be enhanced to secure Uganda’s heritage.

Together we need to ensure good governance in our enforcement and judicial systems. 

My Lord, the Chief Justice, as I come to the end of my opening remarks, I would also like to thank you, Chief Justice for the cordial relationship I have enjoyed with you during my time as Chairperson of the JLOS DP’s group. 

Your passion for the judiciary and the sector is captivating and makes one want to do more for the sector. 

I wish you all the very best in the coming years of the sector and we, the Netherlands, reiterate our continued partnership as we hand over the reins to the EU at the end of this year. 

On behalf of the JLOS Development Partners I would like to convey my appreciation of our strong and constructive partnership. 

We, the development partners, remain firm in our confidence in the sector and in our commitment to stand with or walk by your side in your efforts to achieve a pro-people and transparent justice system.

Thank you for your kind attention and I wish you fruitful deliberations.  

 

  DOWNLOAD SPEECH (PDF)

 

The Hon. The Deputy Chief Justice, 

The Hon. The Principal Judge,

Honourable Ministers in your respective capacities,

Honourable Attorney General, 

Honourable Justices of the Courts of Judicature,

Your Excellencies and Heads of Diplomatic Missions in Uganda, 

The Secretary to Cabinet and Head of the Public Service,

Members of Parliament Present,

The Director of Public Prosecutions,

The Solicitor General and Chairperson of the JLOS Steering Committee,

Chairpersons and Members of Constitutional Commissions,

Heads of the Justice Sector Ministries, Departments and Agencies, 

Heads of Government Institutions present,

Representatives of Civil Society, the Media and Non-State Actors, 

Invited Guests, 

Ladies and Gentlemen.

 

I warmly welcome you all to this 23rd Joint Annual JLOS Government of Uganda – Development Partners’ Review. This is our first review under the Fourth Sector Development Plan (SDP IV). This is, as always, a particularly important event in the JLOS calendar, and is an opportunity to gather and reflect on our progress within the previous year. Although it is the first year under the new strategy, we have delved straight into implementation. We thank the Government of Uganda and the Development Partners for honouring their commitments that were made at the previous review. This support, both financial and technical, has been the driving force for our achievements so far.

 

As we move into the Sector’s 20th year of existence, I must acknowledge the partnerships within and outside the Sector that have kept us going and we trust that these will be maintained and nurtured further. The year has not been without challenges but as you will see from the report, we have also registered significant successes over the period under review. It is important, as a Sector, that we take all steps to live by the values that we adopted under the SDP IV namely – ‘empowering the people, building trust, upholding rights”. 

 

At the start of the SDP IV, we committed ourselves to ensuring that people in Uganda live in a safe and just society, to increase the trust and satisfaction of people with the services of the JLOS institutions, to improve the Index of Judicial Independence and to maintain the ‘A’ Status of the Uganda Human Rights Commission (UHRC). Our efforts throughout the year have been geared towards this.

 

One year into implementation of the SDP IV, people’s trust in JLOS institutions has increased, the Sector has also registered an improvement in the Index of Judicial Independence to 3.42 in 2018 from 3.41 in 2017, according to the World Competitiveness Report, 2018. In terms of the ranking of the national human rights body, the UHRC maintained an ‘A’ status.

 

Our challenge is to deal with concerns from the public that may affect these levels of trust and satisfaction, such as acts of torture, the perception of insecurity and increased crime, delayed disposal of cases before the Courts of law and quality of services, as well as slow and bureaucratic delivery of services. These are issues that we identified and committed ourselves to address as a Sector under SDP IV through improved efficiency and harnessing the potential of innovation.

 

It is my belief that we are well on the path to fulfilling our goals and I wish to specifically highlight some of our achievements so far.

 

Case backlog Reduction

Case backlog reduction has been of primary importance to the Sector under the SDP IV. This ranges from clearance of cases in the Court system, to expediting the processes of investigation by police and resolution of disciplinary matters. The Sector, however, specifically set out to reduce case backlog in the Courts of law from a baseline of 24% in 2016/17 to 19.3% in 2017/18 and an ultimate goal of 9% in 2021. The Case Backlog Reduction Strategy was adopted with the intention of providing strategic interventions to address the overwhelming backlog. This strategy has been implemented through targeted sessions, weeding out exercises in various institutions and the prioritization of resources for hearings of cases by Courts and Tribunals. As a result of these interventions, case backlog has reduced from 24% to 21%. Consequently, the remand population has reduced from 52.4% of the total prison population to 51.4%.

 

The Strategy is therefore beginning to yield fruit. Growth in case backlog has now been arrested and we are managing the existing load. Without the Strategy, the backlog would have stood at 38%. This has been the result of concerted efforts across all the frontline JLOS institutions, improved coordination and communication, and increased use of innovative means to address the backlog, including mediation, plea bargaining and small claims procedures. We are also focusing on specialized measures for some categories of cases including cases involving children and sexual and gender based crime. It is still our commitment to reduce the percentage of case backlog to single digits by 2021 and we are firmly on this path.

 

Access to JLOS services

The Sector also set out to extend its services throughout the Country. In 2016/17, 59.3% of districts had one-stop frontline JLOS service points. With the construction of JLOS centres around the country, we have now expanded coverage to 61.5% of districts. I thank our partners who have consistently contributed to our construction programmes and the extension of JLOS services around the Country. In tandem with the extension of services, we have seen an increase in case filing, case disposal and more coordination among JLOS institutions. We have also seen a decrease in complaints about lost files and overstay in police cells. Agencies such as the Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs, ODPP, UHRC, URSB and DCIC (Passport and Immigration Services), Government Analytical Laboratory and the Law Development Centre have also de-concentrated their services and are now available around the Country. Our presence is surely growing!

 

We are however still grappling with a shortage of staff in many institutions. Only the Judicial Service Commission has reported a full staff structure. This staffing shortage, which is partly a result of inadequate funding, has affected the functionality of institutions both at the headquarters and in the regional offices. It impacts on the institutions ability to provide adequate and timely services. Until this is addressed, the newly constructed facilities will not be used to their full potential; and efficiency levels will fall short of what is expected. The critical shortage of staff across all JLOS institutions must be addressed if we are to achieve the objectives of the SDP IV.

 

Local Council Courts and Informal Justice Systems

I am glad to report the re-constitution of the Local Council Courts system following the successful conclusion of Village and Parish Council elections. With the support of our partners, particularly the Democratic Governance Facility, we have been able to prepare for their capacity building in anticipation of their roles in dispute resolution. We have fully prepared trainers in place and training materials are available. Desk Officers have been placed in all the districts to oversee the establishment of the Local Council Courts at all levels. The Judiciary in turn is building the capacity of the Magistrates to perform their supervisory role over these local courts. The Local Council Courts and other informal justice systems are a critical part of our justice system. They are a first point of call for the majority of citizens in dispute resolution and as such they play a vital role in creating and maintaining the trust and participation of the public in the justice system.

 

Children and Juvenile Justice

The Sector’s Justice for Children programme has grown in strength. The Coordinators located around the Country are well integrated into the District Chain-Linked Committees and are working closely with the institutions to ensure that child friendly processes and diversion programmes are implemented.

 

Different institutions have instituted other measures to support the child-friendly environment. For instance, the Ministry of Gender Labour and Social Development has completed the Kabale Regional Remand Home and commenced on the construction of the Moroto Regional Home to provide appropriate accommodation for children in conflict with the law. 

Institutionalization of children remand homes in the justice system is not our primary goal and diversion is being promoted as the most appropriate alternative for children in conflict with the law, in order to ensure that their growth and development is not brought to a halt by the justice system. It is however necessary for us to provide suitable accommodation where diversion is not an option because the absence of these facilities across the country has resulted into gross injustices to children. These regional remand homes are therefore of great need to our juvenile justice system.  

 

The Legal Aid Clinic of the Law Development Centre, the Legal Aid Project of the Uganda Law Society and Justice Centres Uganda together with the Police, ODPP and Courts, continue to emphasize diversion of children from the Justice system, whenever possible. With the reinstatement of the Local Councils at the village and parish levels, this strategy will be further strengthened as the offices responsible for diversion of children are based at the village and parish levels and we will now be able to empower them to perform these functions.

 

On another front, the ODPP has created a child-friendly space in its facilities as part of its efforts to improve the response to the needs of children who are witnesses or victims of crime, thereby reducing the trauma of the judicial process. It is expected that these facilities will be replicated throughout the Country.

 

Sexual and Gender Based Violence

The efforts to respond to Sexual and Gender Based (SGBV) crime are multi-faceted. These include amendments of the law that have taken place and strengthening of measures to ensure effective implementation of the laws and policies. Specialized training is planned for CID Officers aimed at improving their investigation skills, particularly in SGBV cases. The ODPP has prepared a Prosecutors’ Manual to guide State Attorneys in the handling of SGBV cases and the Judiciary is in advanced stages of arranging Special Sessions of Court to specifically address SGBV cases.

 

There are still challenges with forensic examinations, particularly DNA examinations that are critical to SGBV cases. Regional laboratories have been constructed, however they lack critical equipment, particularly the Genetic Analyser. The acquisition of these items will be one of the areas of focus in improving the handling of SGBV cases.

 

Innovations 

We have seen significant innovations from institutions, resulting in a reduction in lead times for registering a business and obtaining work permits. There have also been reforms to the Trade Licensing laws to reduce the number of permits required to start a business. These innovations are all being bolstered by increased use of technology and e-based services that are expected to culminate in more integration of JLOS services.

The innovations have addressed aspects of customer service and engagement, outreach and public education as well as adoption of e-based platforms to facilitate faster delivery of JLOS services. 

 

We have partnered with the private sector and civil society to identify and nurture innovators and entrepreneurs who are developing new ways of looking at the delivery of public and particularly justice services. Some of these innovators will be introduced to you today. These partnerships and mentorship programmes create a space for mutually beneficial ideas that will enhance and enrich our efforts as a Sector and we look forward to their further growth. 

 

This is however only the first year and a lot remains to be done. Challenges remain that have the potential to derail our progress and in so doing reverse any gains that have been made as far as public trust and satisfaction is concerned.

 

Crime and insecurity

Despite the overall reduction in the crime rate, this past year has been plagued by an upsurge in violent crime.  Kidnaps and murder have been frequently reported, casting a shadow on perceptions of safety.  The key challenge for the Sector is ensuring adequate measures to prevent crime as well as strengthening the capacity of institutions to investigate and handle crime once it happens. The Sector had targeted a reduction in the crime rate from 298 incidences for every 100,000 persons to 287 by 2020. This year, the crime rate stood at 287.9. We therefore clearly registered some achievements and are firmly on course to achieve the SDP IV target. However perceptions are critical in this area and we shall emphasize measures that address the growing areas of crime and our ability to respond fast and effectively to these.

 

Human Rights and the fight against Corruption

In terms of observance of human rights and promotion of accountability, the focus is on enhancing human rights awareness and practice at sectoral and institutional level to reduce the incidence of human rights violations and mainstream the national policy on zero tolerance to corruption.

 

We are on course to realize planned targets by 2020/21 under the fight against corruption demonstrated by improvement in the 2017 corruption perception score by Transparency International from 25% to 26%, narrowing the overall performance gap by 20%.  This has been attributed to sustained enforcement of internal and external accountability by the Sector and other public institutions.

 

The culpability of JLOS institutions for human rights violations continues to reduce.  A 2.1% reduction was registered by the Uganda Human Rights Commission (UHRC) from 46% to 43.9%.  Nonetheless, the incidences over the past months have made the issue of torture one of national and international debate.  It is important that we stand firm as a Sector and take a stand against torture and all forms of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment. We reiterate our stand against torture and all forms of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment and emphasize that individuals should be held accountable for any acts of torture that they perpetuate. We firmly believe that with the coming into force of the much anticipated regulations under the Prevention and Prohibition of Torture Act, the law should be fully enforced and we will continue to emphasize this.

 

Prison Congestion

The current prison population stands at about 52,000, while the holding capacity is 18,000. The population is therefore about 3 times the capacity and therefore congestion remains an outstanding challenge for the Sector. 

 

Through construction and renovation programmes, the holding capacity has increased from 11,000 to 18,000 over 10 years. Congestion is still high, however there are other efforts to reduce the prison population pressure such as improved investigations, strengthened prosecution and enhanced case disposal. The remand/convict ratio, stands at 51/49 and conviction rates stand at 62%. It can therefore be discerned that 38% of the remand population should not be in prison. Nonetheless, the prison population is likely to remain high and efforts must continue to renovate and provide more appropriate facilities to ensure that human rights standards are met.

 

Commercial Justice and Improved environment for investment

In terms of strengthening commercial justice and the environment for competitiveness, the Sector took the strategic decision to reform, enforce and update laws to promote competitiveness and regional integration.  Significant innovations from key institutions have resulted in a reduction in lead times for registration and licensing processes.  Automation continues to be a key strategy for providing customer-oriented services that promote faster disposal of cases, registration of documents and issuance of permits and licenses.  It is expected that the automation process will culminate in more integrated services.  It is therefore important that we continue to support the processes of automation in JLOS institutions, including the Judiciary in line with agreed protocols for integration and data sharing.  The concept of ‘Ask Once’ promotes the notion that information that has been provided to one institution, should not be asked for by another.  Instead a client should be confident that once they provide the information to one institution, it should, within agreed parameters and cognizant of privacy laws, be available to others.  This will reduce the number of times a client is asked for key data such as date of birth, place of residence and occupational details.  This should be the ultimate goal of the integration process.

 

While we celebrate our collective achievements today, we still have our work cut out for us. I am confident though that the strength of the Sector wide approach will provide the necessary framework for us to address these challenges together. Allow me to take this opportunity to thank all our partners in Government, Civil Society and from the Development Partners for the commitment to our development agenda and the support they have given to us to make it possible to register the successes that we report today. 

 

The challenges notwithstanding, implementation of the 2017/18 workplan appears to be satisfactory.  This conference is intended to review the report, consider the successes and challenges, and propose remedial measures to address the short-falls as we continue with the implementation of the SDP IV. I invite you to join me in a frank discussion of the Sector progress and challenges and in charting out a path for the year ahead. 

 

I thank you all for your personal attendance today and it is now my honour and pleasure to declare the 23rd Annual Joint JLOS Government of Uganda – Development Partners Review Conference open.

 

Bart M. Katureebe

CHIEF JUSTICE AND CHAIRPERSON OF THE JLOS LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE.